There will be sufficient time in the months and years ahead to examine the crack up of the liberal commentariat precipitated by Bernie Sanders and his candidacy. In the meantime, it continues to peddle the canard that Sanders has not yet been subject to attack while Hillary has been “vetted.”
Just what was all the redbaiting done by Claire McCaskill and other Clinton surrogate sluggers, one might ask.
Adam Johnson examines this at Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. (Could any rubric be more diametric to the “mainstream” “news” media?)
Johnson writes that “The problem is this Beltway dogma is based entirely on rhetorical sleight-of-hand, conventional wisdom and unfalsifiable assumptions.”
So what else is new?
In the meantime, it’s interesting to see that even Harry Reid has begun to understand how dangerous is the (non-existent, of course) defamation of Sanders by the Democratic establishment (clean-house time).