But both are/were adherents of the utterly wacky, nonsensical doctrine of “Originalism,” which presumes than a citizen of 1789 would magically be able to comprehend current realities.
“Originalism” is nothing but a smokescreen for the worst in arbitrary, self-serving contortions of legal logic–as we saw with Scalia’s written-at-a-scream, rhetorical and judicial flim-flam.